well-temperedforum.groupee.net
The New Democratic Meme

This topic can be found at:
https://well-temperedforum.groupee.net/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9130004433/m/5171069266

15 January 2019, 10:05 PM
Steve Miller
The New Democratic Meme
“Understand that I’ll vote for whoever ends up with a “D” after their name, but this particular candidate...”. Barf

How about we get a candidate that doesn’t require this nonsense?


--------------------------------
Life is short. Play with your dog.

15 January 2019, 11:43 PM
Daniel
What? Is this DCCC crap?
15 January 2019, 11:56 PM
QuirtEvans
Everything before the “But” is true for me.
16 January 2019, 10:50 AM
Nina
Because the likely non-D alternative is Barf Barf

I don't understand why this simple concept is so difficult to grasp. We're not talking hypotheticals here. If there's a viable candidate that makes you gag less, you vote for that candidate in the general election. Emphasis on viable, as in "has a chance to win." I think the stakes are too high to throw away your vote on a meaningless protest. I say meaningless, because those votes for write-in candidates (anyone but Hillary, Bernie wuz robbed), or those who stayed home and did't vote at all, gave us Trump. So how's that protest working out for us?

Primaries are a whole different animal. There's a reason why the GOP are behaving like a bunch of spineless wimps, and it has to do largely with fear of "being primaried."
16 January 2019, 10:57 AM
Nina
I refound an article on voting and game theory that I had previously liked. It's getting long in the tooth (I wonder what the author would say about the 2016 election, for example), but gives a good outline of "gaming the vote."

Game Theory and Voting
16 January 2019, 08:28 PM
QuirtEvans
quote:
Originally posted by Nina:
Because the likely non-D alternative is Barf Barf

I don't understand why this simple concept is so difficult to grasp. We're not talking hypotheticals here. If there's a viable candidate that makes you gag less, you vote for that candidate in the general election. Emphasis on viable, as in "has a chance to win." I think the stakes are too high to throw away your vote on a meaningless protest. I say meaningless, because those votes for write-in candidates (anyone but Hillary, Bernie wuz robbed), or those who stayed home and did't vote at all, gave us Trump. So how's that protest working out for us?

Primaries are a whole different animal. There's a reason why the GOP are behaving like a bunch of spineless wimps, and it has to do largely with fear of "being primaried."


'xactly.
16 January 2019, 09:51 PM
Steve Miller
I’m waiting for a candidate I can actually support. Haven’t seen one yet but I don’t know anything about Gillibrand.


--------------------------------
Life is short. Play with your dog.

17 January 2019, 11:05 AM
Nina
The only (POTUS) candidate I've ever voted for that I actually supported was Obama. My first vote was the Carter election.