Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Has Achieved Nirvana |
“Understand that I’ll vote for whoever ends up with a “D” after their name, but this particular candidate...”. How about we get a candidate that doesn’t require this nonsense?
| ||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana |
What? Is this DCCC crap? | |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana |
Everything before the “But” is true for me. | |||
|
Pinta & the Santa Maria Has Achieved Nirvana |
Because the likely non-D alternative is I don't understand why this simple concept is so difficult to grasp. We're not talking hypotheticals here. If there's a viable candidate that makes you gag less, you vote for that candidate in the general election. Emphasis on viable, as in "has a chance to win." I think the stakes are too high to throw away your vote on a meaningless protest. I say meaningless, because those votes for write-in candidates (anyone but Hillary, Bernie wuz robbed), or those who stayed home and did't vote at all, gave us Trump. So how's that protest working out for us? Primaries are a whole different animal. There's a reason why the GOP are behaving like a bunch of spineless wimps, and it has to do largely with fear of "being primaried." | |||
|
Pinta & the Santa Maria Has Achieved Nirvana |
I refound an article on voting and game theory that I had previously liked. It's getting long in the tooth (I wonder what the author would say about the 2016 election, for example), but gives a good outline of "gaming the vote." Game Theory and Voting | |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana |
'xactly. | |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana |
I’m waiting for a candidate I can actually support. Haven’t seen one yet but I don’t know anything about Gillibrand.
| |||
|
Pinta & the Santa Maria Has Achieved Nirvana |
The only (POTUS) candidate I've ever voted for that I actually supported was Obama. My first vote was the Carter election. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |