Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
| ||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
The floodgates are starting to open. Rutgers and UMass Amherst have announced similar policies. | |||
|
(self-titled) semi-posting lurker Minor Deity ![]() |
Princeton's plan is a little more complicated https://www.princeton.edu/news...020-21-academic-year
Meanwhile, no news/updates from my uni. The plan is (was?) to have 75% of classes F2F, but the F2F is the hyflex model, with some students present in classroom, and other synchronously Zooming in. In this model, no instructors ever get sick. So, yay, right? ![]()
| |||
|
Minor Deity![]() |
There go all the international students. Online only? No VISA for you! "Active students currently in the United States enrolled in such programs must depart the country or take other measures, such as transferring to a school with in-person instruction to remain in lawful status," read a release from ICE's Student and Exchange Visitor Program. "If not, they may face immigration consequences including, but not limited to, the initiation of removal proceedings." ![]()
| |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
There's one obvious effect of that rule, and one less obvious one. The obvious one: schools will feel economic pressure to be open in-person, or else they'll lose the flow of international tuition that is critical for some of them. The less obvious one: it isn't just good enough for a school to be open for in-person classes. Foreign students have to ATTEND. So, if in-person attendance is optional they have to bear the risk of attendance while their domestic classmates can make the choice to attend remotely. | |||
|
(self-titled) semi-posting lurker Minor Deity ![]() |
I hadn't thought of it that way. Well, gee, it's consistent though isn't it. The most marginalized groups tend to be the ones with the least amount of choice in terms of exposing themselves to covid risk ![]()
| |||
|
Pinta & the Santa Maria Has Achieved Nirvana ![]() |
To be honest, they have to ENROLL. I can think of a jillion ways around this, but the universities will have to adopt some sort of hybrid model. Because the rules are so unclear, I think a professor could require a 20-minute face-to-face "recitation" sometime during the term and the course could be considered not fully online. The other unspoken issue here is whether professors can be compelled to teach in person. Some can't wait to get back to the classroom/lab, others are very concerned for whatever reason. But how this shakes out, statistically speaking, is that in-person courses are more likely to be taught by junior faculty, adjuncts and graduate students, increasing their risk of exposure. The bottom line of this, for me, is that it's a punitive, ill-conceived notion that someone in ICE dreamed up as a means to massage Trump's ego and signal to his base. But the issues of inequality regarding who gets to stay home and who has to go to work are alive and well in higher ed, just as they are in any other workplace. | |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
Berkeley is coming up with a 1 credit in-person class for international students to sign up for so they can stay here and keep their visas.
| |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
![]()
| |||
|
Pinta & the Santa Maria Has Achieved Nirvana ![]() |
Great idea. They could even give it some sort of jingoistic title like "Patriotism for non-Americans," to push back on any criticism from the White House. I'm kidding. Sort of. | |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
From The Hill:
| |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|