Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
Rest of editorial here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...hold-that/ar-BBYtsWl
| ||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
Bless his heart.
| |||
|
Minor Deity![]() |
Under other circumstances his words might carry some weight. But since the articles are simply the next chapter of the effort to overturn the election that began on the night of the election, not so much.
| |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
Some people simply think that he's doing damaging (read: impeachable) things that no president should. Here's a thought experiment. Substitute "President Hillary Clinton" for any story written about Trump/Ukraine and get back to me with what you'd think about what's been going on. I'd be very surprised if you would be nearly as generous in your interpretation of whether the president was acting appropriately and in the best interests of the country. edit: I should add that I understand that the view can be that the Democrats have been trying to find something on Trump for forever. Those on the other side felt that way about the Clintons and the "vast right wing conspiracy". Neither side does themselves any favors by viewing every single thing as a perceived transgression. But by the same token, it's dangerous to ignore behaviors because you think the other side is suffering from some derangement syndrome. Sometimes the president *is* a crook.
| |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|