Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Has Achieved Nirvana |
https://youtu.be/nFoAczoHbV0 I know some of you don't like to hear these facts. Sorry. Credit where credit is due. Blame where blame is due, too. | ||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana |
You used "facts" to describe a Sky News report? Ummm .... | |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana |
It's 6 min, 18 sec. You might watch it and evaluate the content. I think the difference between the facts and opinions would be apparent. Quirt, this link contains a clip of Fauci himself admitting what he did when he funded gain of function research at the Wuhan lab. | |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana |
He said they studied the animal/human interface. That's all he said. For maybe 10 seconds. And then the Sky News "journalist" went off on a rant. And then they interviewed Trump ... which, if we are trying to obtain facts, is probably the last thing I would ever do. Let me be clear. NOT trying to understand how viruses jump from animals to humans would be incredibly irresponsible for a public health official. As to where that research took place ... that's a judgment call. I trust Dr. Fauci. You don't. But this supposed "news" is absurd and isn't journalism. And his minor contribution to the segment proves nearly nothing, unless you've already reached conclusions and you're viewing everything through the lens of confirmation. | |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana |
Some additional info from MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.c...ks-america-to-wuhan/
| |||
|
Pinta & the Santa Maria Has Achieved Nirvana |
"Gain of function" is an unfortunate term, which means pretty much any type of genetic manipulation. It is not reserved only for manipulations that lead to a more lethal version of the virus, which the Foxtel person is arguing. The debate really involves the origins of the COVID-19 variant: natural mutation transmitted in the wild from animal to man (most likely bat to some intermediary animal tbd to man), or an escape from the Wuhan lab. That's the debate. Then the GOF question was raised, with zero evidence that there was any US-funded GOF research on the COVID-19 variant in Wuhan. Voila! Lab escape and GOF research was now intertwined, incorrectly. It's also worth noting that the lab escape theory is just that: a theory. If the origin of the virus was not from the lab, the GOF debate is irrelevant. The details do matter. GOF research doesn't always mean enhanced pathology. SARS-CoV-2 write large is not the same thing, genetically, as COVID-19. Gain of function is a terrible term, in part because it allows for such misuse and misinterpretation. Was it innocent in this reporters case? I don't know, but my assumption is that it was not. Key clues for me: the Trump interview and the fact that it was aired on Sky News, a Murdoch/Australia controlled outlet that has been banned multiple times from social media for spreading misinformation about COVID. | |||
|
"I've got morons on my team." Mitt Romney Minor Deity |
⬆︎ This is a dispassionate analysis of evidence and text. | |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana |
I think Dr. Redfield's argument makes sense. https://youtu.be/f0_RhfT21bw On top of this, Dr. Fauci is not a virologist. | |||
|
"I've got morons on my team." Mitt Romney Minor Deity |
Dredged up his six month old "explosive claims." Have fun. Most virologists seemingly don't accept these claims. Why Redfield Is (was) wrong on SARS-CoV-2 Origins You actually have to read this carefully in order to see how divorced Redfield is from the scientific mainstream.
| |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |