Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
SNAFU
| ||
|
Beatification Candidate![]() |
We've always had paper backups on our electronic voting machines, but if the electronic numbers aren't verified with a follow-up count of the paper ballots, I don't think that provides any comfort. I've been suspicious of the electronic counts ever since they began!
| |||
|
"I've got morons on my team." Mitt Romney Minor Deity ![]() |
I am less concerned by software glitches than I am by deliberate tampering/hacking. Software glitches are likely to lead to absurdities. Tampering, by contrast, will be more subtle, producing outcomes less likely to generate automatic recounts of the paper trail. | |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
Were the Russkies simply honing their talents?
| |||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
Why does this stuff always result in Republican victories?
| |||
|
Pinta & the Santa Maria Has Achieved Nirvana ![]() |
Exactly. I can easily come up with an algorithm that would inject a defined amount of variation into the counts to ensure a victory for any side. But it would look random. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|