Suborning perjury? Sounds like there's solid evidence beyond a Cohen/Trump he said/he said.
quote:
President Donald Trump directed his longtime attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, according to two federal law enforcement officials involved in an investigation of the matter.
Trump also supported a plan, set up by Cohen, to visit Russia during the presidential campaign, in order to personally meet President Vladimir Putin and jump-start the tower negotiations. “Make it happen,” the sources said Trump told Cohen.
And even as Trump told the public he had no business deals with Russia, the sources said Trump and his children Ivanka and Donald Trump Jr. received regular, detailed updates about the real estate development from Cohen, whom they put in charge of the project.
Cohen pleaded guilty in November to lying about the deal in testimony and in a two-page statement to the Senate and House intelligence committees. Special counsel Robert Mueller noted that Cohen’s false claim that the project ended in January 2016 was an attempt to “minimize links between the Moscow Project and Individual 1” — widely understood to be Trump — “in hopes of limiting the ongoing Russia investigations.”
Now the two sources have told BuzzFeed News that Cohen also told the special counsel that after the election, the president personally instructed him to lie — by claiming that negotiations ended months earlier than they actually did — in order to obscure Trump’s involvement.
The special counsel’s office learned about Trump’s directive for Cohen to lie to Congress through interviews with multiple witnesses from the Trump Organization and internal company emails, text messages, and a cache of other documents. Cohen then acknowledged those instructions during his interviews with that office.
This revelation is not the first evidence to suggest the president may have attempted to obstruct the FBI and special counsel investigations into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.
But Cohen's testimony marks a significant new frontier: It is the first known example of Trump explicitly telling a subordinate to lie directly about his own dealings with Russia.
It says there's something that's not accurate in the story, but no hint as to what that might be. The Mueller statement is big news just because he never says anything.
While the one BuzzFeed reporter has a somewhat checkered journalistic past, for the reporting on Trump-Russia connections, he and his colleague have been doing great work. They've broken important stories early. It's taken months in some cases for the stories to be proven true, but ultimately they have been.
Woodward and Bernstein had their moments when things looked rocky during their investigation of Nixon and Watergate. Looked like Nixon might sail through. Then the tapes showed up.
Will that happen here, or did BuzzFeed screw up? No answer yet, but definitely popcorn time on all fronts.
-------------------------------- When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie Aumônier
Posts: 38217 | Location: Somewhere in the middle | Registered: 19 January 2010
Mueller sent a very cryptic note saying, essentially, that portions of the article were wrong. What portions? he doesn't say. But it wasn't exactly a full-throated denial.
We need to wait for Mueller's official report. I just wish he'd hurry up (though I appreciate the need to get everything right).
Posts: 35428 | Location: West: North and South! | Registered: 20 April 2005