No, really.

https://www.vox.com/future-per...p3g3Ttv0lyejPTl6KkdE

The best line:

quote:

“Mum said she wished she had met me before I was born and that if she did, she definitely wouldn’t have had me,” Samuel told the BBC.

quote:

Because it’s not possible to ask children for consent before they are created, he argues, it’s wrong to have them at all.

Makes sense to me !

A great motivation to invent time travel -- so if necessary you can go back in time to tell your biological parents to do things differently.

But what if the parents lose and via case law sue their own parents (presumably deceased) for their own unpermitted births? And the parents are then assessed those same damages, from out of their inheritance (more, if Indians are responsible for their parents' debts)?

Seems the final antinatalist lawsuit couldn't possibly yield a profit once all debts are paid, especially if living expenses are subtracted.

At best, a wash not counting court costs.