I think the extent to which they’ve allowed their institutionalized fear of the CCP to supersede their mission is unforgivable, and will require total housecleaning to fix.
-------------------------------- If you think looting is bad wait until I tell you about civil forfeiture.
Posts: 33811 | Location: On the Hudson | Registered: 20 April 2005
USA halts WHO funding. China back fills the funding. China completes takeover of WHO. We may have to build a WHO replacement, hopefully there are enough powerful allies out there willing to do that with us.
But let me caution you in all seriousness to resist the urge to pick a side here.
Trump can be self-serving and incompetent AND the WHO can be hopelessly corrupt. It’s ok to hold both of those thoughts simultaneously.
Yes it is, even in these days of partisan divide.
Many of the organizations of international life are completely corrupt. Some because they are captive to authoritarian nations (like the WHO, or heck, the world chess federation), and some to cabals of special interests that run the show and siphon off its resources (like FIFA).
Posts: 12759 | Location: Williamsburg, VA | Registered: 19 July 2005
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates criticized President Trump’s decision to suspend funding to the World Health Organization as “dangerous,” saying the payments should continue particularly during the global coronavirus pandemic.
“Halting funding for the World Health Organization during a world health crisis is as dangerous as it sounds,” Gates tweeted early Wednesday. “Their work is slowing the spread of COVID-19 and if that work is stopped no other organization can replace them. The world needs @WHO now more than ever.”
The United States, the organization’s largest donor, has committed to provide the WHO with $893 million during its current two-year funding period, a State Department spokesperson told The Washington Post.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the family’s giant philanthropy, is the next biggest donor to WHO after the U.S., accounting for close to 10 percent of the United Nations agency’s funding.
eta:
quote:
While some of Trump’s conservative allies are focusing on the WHO as complicit in a Chinese coverup of the outbreak, others have urged the president to hold off on moving forward on suspending funding.
“If the president wants to genuinely hold the WHO accountable, counter Chinese efforts to shift blame for COVID-19, and reform the WHO to better respond to the next pandemic, he should not cut funding — at least not yet,” wrote Brett D. Schaefer, an expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation and member of the U.N.'s Committee on Contributions.