But you already knew that.

They’re All Good Dogs, and It Has Nothing to Do With Their Breed (NYT Article)

They’re All Good Dogs, and It Has Nothing to Do With Their Breed

Retrievers that don’t retrieve and Papillons that point are all possible because the genes that shape dog behavior predate modern breeding that focuses on appearance, researchers find.



By James Gorman
April 28, 2022


Don’t judge a book by its cover. Don’t judge a dog by its breed.

After conducting owner surveys for 18,385 dogs and sequencing the genomes of 2,155 dogs, a group of researchers reported a variety of findings in the journal Science on Thursday, including that for predicting some dog behaviors, breed is essentially useless, and for most, not very good. For instance, one of the clearest findings in the massive, multifaceted study is that breed has no discernible effect on a dog’s reactions to something it finds new or strange.

This behavior is related to what the nonscientist might call aggression and would seem to cast doubt on breed stereotypes of aggressive dogs, like pit bulls. One thing pit bulls did score high on was human sociability, no surprise to anyone who has seen internet videos of lap-loving pit bulls. Labrador retriever ancestry, on the other hand, didn’t seem to have any significant correlation with human sociability.

This is not to say that there are no differences among breeds, or that breed can’t predict some things. If you adopt a Border collie, said Elinor Karlsson of the Broad Institute and the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, an expert in dog genomics and an author of the report, the probability that it will be easier to train and interested in toys “is going to be higher than if you adopt a Great Pyrenees.”

But for any given dog you just don’t know — on average, breed accounts for only about 9 percent of the variations in any given dog’s behavior. And no behaviors were restricted to any one breed, even howling, though the study found that behavior was more strongly associated with breeds like Siberian huskies than with other dogs.



And yet, in what might seem paradoxical at first, the researchers also found that behavior patterns are strongly inherited. The behaviors they studied had a 25 percent heritability, a complex measure which indicates the influence of genes, but depends on the group of animals studied. But with enough dogs, heritability is a good measure of what’s inherited. In comparing whole genomes, they found several genes that clearly influence behavior, including one for how friendly dogs are.


Border collies are still likelier to be easier to train and interested in toys than, say, a Pyrenees, Dr. Karlsson said.
Border collies are still likelier to be easier to train and interested in toys than, say, a Pyrenees, Dr. Karlsson said.Credit...William DeShazer for The New York Times
Border collies are still likelier to be easier to train and interested in toys than, say, a Pyrenees, Dr. Karlsson said.


Unlike most scientific research, any dog owner can contribute data. The researchers got their information from Darwin’s Ark, a project that asks owners of any dog to submit DNA swabs.
Unlike most scientific research, any dog owner can contribute data. The researchers got their information from Darwin’s Ark, a project that asks owners of any dog to submit DNA swabs.Credit...Amir Hamja for The New York Times
Unlike most scientific research, any dog owner can contribute data. The researchers got their information from Darwin’s Ark, a project that asks owners of any dog to submit DNA swabs.

What the study means is that dog behaviors are strongly inherited, but that the genes that shape whether your dog is friendly, aggressive or aloof date from long before the 19th century when most modern breeds, like those recognized by the American Kennel Club, were created. Breeding since then has been primarily for physical characteristics.

Kathryn Lord, an evolutionary biologist also of the Broad Institute and the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, and another author of the paper, said, “German shorthaired pointers were slightly more likely to point or golden retrievers were slightly more likely to retrieve or Siberian huskies to howl.”

But buyer, or dog adopter beware. “I’ve known Labradors who’ve howled and Papillons who pointed and greyhounds who retrieved as well as retrievers who didn’t,” Dr. Lord said.


The findings probably won’t surprise people who work closely with dogs, like Dr. Cynthia Otto, director of the Penn Vet Working Dog Center at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Otto, who was not involved in the report, said that the study “totally makes sense to me. I think there are some big picture behavioral traits more common in some breeds than others, but the individual variation is so high within a breed.”

For example, she said, breeders have favored Border collies who are easier to train, which may explain why training them is easier. But she added that, “certainly within the Border collies — there is still great individual variation.”

The research for the new study began about eight years ago, Dr. Karlsson said, and the original goal was to compare genomes of mutts with breed dogs in what is called a genome-wide association study, to look for DNA areas or genes associated with certain behaviors.


Kathleen Morrill, also an author of the paper with the Broad Institute and the Chan Medical School, said that the study’s high number of mixed breed dogs, or what the authors and you may call mutts, was a major strength.

“Mutts were actually the perfect kind of dog for sussing out the connections between breed and behavior,” she said, because their DNA is so shuffled that it’s easier to separate looks from behavior.

Evan Maclean, the director of the Arizona Canine Cognition Center at the University of Arizona who was not involved in the study, said, “This is one of the first papers to really do impressive dog genomics work using mixed breed dogs.” These dogs have such variety that it makes genetic comparisons more powerful, he said, but they have been excluded from a lot of earlier studies. “And this paper just shows how valuable those populations can be,” he added.

The researchers found 11 specific DNA regions associated with behavior. This finding could assist in the study of human genomics, although the researchers are just scratching the surface of the relationship between both species’ genomes. A region that affected the likelihood of a dog howling, for example, is associated in humans with language development. And a region connected to enjoying being around humans is also present in human DNA, where it is associated with long-term memory.

Unlike most scientific research, any dog owner can help out on this project.

The researchers got their wealth of information from Darwin’s Ark, a project that Dr. Karlsson and her colleagues created by asking owners of any breed or mutt to submit DNA swabs of their dogs and answer questionnaires. They are still looking for more dogs.

“Anybody from anywhere in the world can sign up,” Dr. Karlsson said.

James Gorman is a science writer at large and the author of books on hypochondria, penguins, dinosaurs and the ocean around Antarctica. He writes about animals, viruses, archaeology and the evolution of dogs.

Cosmos is a sweet, loving, smart, trained, and very stubborn boy sometimes!



Certain "personality" traits are definitely in the dog gene pool.

Tibetan Terriers are one of the oldest breeds and they are well known to be stubborn. It's a good thing they don't get much bigger than 20 lbs because, sometimes you just have to pick them up to get them to move. lol Shadow was the same way. Our first TT.

I really thought about this and my pretty extensive experience with dogs of various breeds. I disagree. While there is variation inside a breed, in my experience there is far more similarity and predictability.

The Mechanical Shepard breed in an exception also. The male
trains every litter, but only for metric work.

I started to read the actual paper yesterday but got distracted and hadn't finished it yet.

This article by Katherine Wu in the Atlantic popped up in my news feed this morning. While I didn't get to the end of the actual study, from what I did read, I think this piece does a better job of summarizing the results than the NYT article does:

https://www.theatlantic.com/sc...racteristics/629707/