Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
On the table in New Mexico.
https://thehill.com/homenews/s...-all-state-residents
| ||
|
Has Achieved Nirvana![]() |
The kicker is whether it covers fees. In Massachusetts, when the state launched a scholarship program to cover tuition at all state schools if you had good enough scores on the state standardized tests, UMass responded by slowing increases in tuition, but increasing fees exponentially. So, good news! Free tuition! But the fees are outrageous now. Similarly, a school could require students to live on campus all four years at some exorbitant rate, or have an incredibly expensive meal plan. But free tuition! | |||
|
"I've got morons on my team." Mitt Romney Minor Deity ![]() |
That's the kicker to me. Like many other "free" programs, it puts not one dollar in the pocket of low-income families. For them, the greatest financial barriers to higher education are living expenses and foregone wages. For low-income families tuition is already "free" because it's covered by existing need-based state grants and federal Pell grants. Since it doesn't change the financial constraints for low-income families "free college" will create little to no access, i.e. it's not likely to send too many more students to college who would not already have gone. What it will do is reduce the burden, slightly, for middle income and high income families. So progressive ... | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|