Originally posted by jon-nyc: In the second clause of bullet point two, she proposes eliminating the filibuster. Odd way to roll out a proposal for such a huge governance change.
Fantasy and empty promises. The filibuster will stay and if she thinks Congress will pass laws to shut down the money train without the threat of being hanged on Capitol Hill she’s more deranged than Bernie.
But I don’t think she believes what she is saying. She’s just gunning for the nomination.
-------------------------------- "A mob is a place where people go to get away from their conscience" Atticus Finch
Originally posted by Mikhailoh: if she thinks Congress will pass laws to shut down the money train without the threat of being hanged on Capitol Hill she’s more deranged than Bernie. .
Sad, but true
-------------------------------- Several people have eaten my cooking and survived.
Posts: 25713 | Location: Still living at 9000 feet in the High Rockies of Colorado | Registered: 20 April 2005
I don't trust her at all. Also, there is something very, very mean-spirited about her. I perceive it every time she does her, "Thank you for your question. I appreciate it." number. She winds herself up and starts screeching. Pay attention and you'll notice all of the ersatz pleasantness is gone in a remarkably short time. Listen to her words and notice how she ends by reprimanding the original questioner, or the person on whose behalf the question was asked, or the premise of the original question. I think it's telling that she slipped her plan to end the filibuster into a plan on gun violence. Her record of making plans and carrying through with them is limited. Yet she seems to have a plan for everything including becoming president and ending the filibuster. SMH.
