well-temperedforum.groupee.net    The Well-Tempered Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  Off Key    A White Woman, Racism, and a Poodle
Page 1 2 3 4 

Moderators: QuirtEvans, pianojuggler, wtg
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
A White Woman, Racism, and a Poodle
 Login/Join
 
Has Achieved Nirvana
Picture of QuirtEvans
posted Hide Post
As to the rest, you are making tons of assumptions about the facts. Those will certainly not always be the fact pattern.
 
Posts: 45738 | Registered: 20 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Has Achieved Nirvana
Picture of Daniel
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Nina:
But a big part of the defund police movement (gad I hate that name) is the lack of proportionality to these things. You have a policeman pulling someone over for a burned-out tail light who is fully armed and ready to head to a gunfight. Traffic stops are inherently dangerous, but part of their danger is due to the police being armed.

Bear me out. Hypothetically, let's say that there exists an unarmed (or minimally armed, say taser alone) police force whose main job is to deal with traffic violations and disturbing the peace - parking, burned out tail lights, no signal, speeding, even suspected DWI/DUI, drunken yelling and/or mental illness. If the person in the car or being stopped and questioned knows he's going to be ticketed or arrested but not shot, the situation is already less fraught. If the cop knows he doesn't have the quick fallback of drawing his weapon, s/he won't be so aggressive when interacting with the driver.

Extend this to non-traffic violations like disturbing the peace, public drunkenness, mental illness. Add in a bit of training. I think this is potentially a better way forward.

Further (waiting for heads to explode) why do we have police pulling over people for speeding anyway? The only time I ever got a speeding ticket was from a camera. It worked--I was speeding, I was clearly visible in the photo, I paid my fine (via internet) and moved on with my life--lesson learned.

Yes, there are the "but what about the truly dangerous guy...," and they certainly exist. However, they don't exist, I don't think, at nearly the rate that warrants fully armed police pulling over every traffic violator or drunk dude yelling and screaming as he walks down the street. So occasionally a bad guy gets away, but a much larger number of people aren't threatened, aren't living in fear of random escalation, racial profiling that could turn deadly.

I think it's definitely worth a thought.


"Fraught" is a good word.

My head almost did explode when you suggested your hypothetical police force deal with... the mentally ill. I'm assuming you probably meant the homeless mentally ill population.

Ideally, police officers would not have to deal with the mentally ill. They aren't equipped for it.

It was an American tragedy when Reagan relesed the mentally ill into the streets and a vast number of them ended up criminally incarcerated.
 
Posts: 24717 | Registered: 31 March 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Does This Avatar Make My Butt Look Big?

Minor Deity
Picture of Cindysphinx
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by QuirtEvans:
As to the rest, you are making tons of assumptions about the facts. Those will certainly not always be the fact pattern.


That's true. I was trying to suggest to you that it is not easy to convince anyone they are demonstrating racism or bias in how they do their job, and they are almost always resistant to and insulted by the very suggestion.

There are numerous challenges in preparing a statistical analysis that accounts for the relevant variables, not to mention data limitations. Like, say you want to know whether officers are pulling over a disproportionate number of Latino drivers. Your first challenge will be figuring out which drivers are Latino. Are you going by last name alone? Skin color? Are you sure you can distinguish between a Latino person and someone from Pakistan? How about Latinos who are very pale and look white, and mixed race people?

In other words, these things are complex. Rather than try to do a reliable statistical analysis AND convince deputies that they are being biased AND figure out how on earth they could learned not to be biased, it might just be easier to decide we don't care enough about turn signal violations to bother.
 
Posts: 19763 | Location: A cluttered house in Metro D.C. | Registered: 20 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Has Achieved Nirvana
Picture of QuirtEvans
posted Hide Post
This seems relevant to the turn signal discussion. Tim Scott is black, a Republican, and a U.S. Senator. From Twitter:

"Tim Scott says in the past year he was pulled over and given a warning for *not turning on his turn signal early enough* on a turn. Once was pulled over 7 times in a year."
 
Posts: 45738 | Registered: 20 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Does This Avatar Make My Butt Look Big?

Minor Deity
Picture of Cindysphinx
posted Hide Post
Ticky tack harassment unrelated to public safety.
 
Posts: 19763 | Location: A cluttered house in Metro D.C. | Registered: 20 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Serial origamist
Has Achieved Nirvana
Picture of pianojuggler
posted Hide Post
There are enough inane laws on the books that pretty much any cop can pull over pretty much any driver at any time.

And, as we've seen and heard, if they can't find anything obvious, they'll make something up. A distant relative was once driving his ratty old van and got pulled over on the basis that "one of his mudflaps was half-missing".


--------------------------------
pj, citizen-poster, unless specifically noted otherwise.

mod-in-training.

pj@ermosworld∙com

All types of erorrs fixed while you wait.

 
Posts: 30038 | Registered: 27 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Has Achieved Nirvana
Picture of QuirtEvans
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pianojuggler:
There are enough inane laws on the books that pretty much any cop can pull over pretty much any driver at any time.

And, as we've seen and heard, if they can't find anything obvious, they'll make something up. A distant relative was once driving his ratty old van and got pulled over on the basis that "one of his mudflaps was half-missing".


I don't want to assume ... is your distant relative white?

All of which goes to prove, tell them not to enforce turn signals, they'll just enforce something else. The classic is "you were driving erratically".

Which is why, hard as it may be, the only way to ensure that they aren't engaging in racial bias is to audit them, through dash cam footage of their stops. True, you won't always know the race of the person they are stopping, but hopefully you'll see what the cop saw, and, if it's hard for you to know, it's hard for them to know, too.

Or, we could just say don't enforce turn signal laws, and declare the problem solved, even though we know they'll just stop people for something else.
 
Posts: 45738 | Registered: 20 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Never Offline
posted Hide Post
I strongly welcome any attempt to gather more data about law enforcement racism. However I suspect those numbers will not be generated. This alternate method of proof of systemic racism, the one that involves viral anecdote culled from millions of arrests, is doing very well without the risk of numbers which might not align with it.
 
Posts: 900 | Location: Bay Area of CA | Registered: 21 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Serial origamist
Has Achieved Nirvana
Picture of pianojuggler
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by QuirtEvans:

I don't want to assume ... is your distant relative white?
Yes, but he was a scrawny unwashed hick living in rural Oregon. An area where an old beat up van in black spray paint is probably a rolling meth lab. All his lights worked, his tabs were current, he wasn't driving erratically or too fast or too slowly. But a cop really really really wanted to pull him over and see what was in the back of the van.

If they want to hassle you, they will.


--------------------------------
pj, citizen-poster, unless specifically noted otherwise.

mod-in-training.

pj@ermosworld∙com

All types of erorrs fixed while you wait.

 
Posts: 30038 | Registered: 27 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
czarina
Has Achieved Nirvana
Picture of piqué
posted Hide Post
i think vans must be a common target. when i drove vans it seems like i was stopped a lot more. especially at the canadian border i had to take everything out of the van and put it back again. happened twice.


--------------------------------
fear is the thief of dreams

 
Posts: 21349 | Registered: 18 May 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Does This Avatar Make My Butt Look Big?

Minor Deity
Picture of Cindysphinx
posted Hide Post
The idea is you strip officers of the right to make any discretionary stops that do not have a strong connection to public safety. Off the top of my head, that would include:

Equipment violations
Turn signal
Failure to maintain lane
Seat belt

These are the offenses that officers use to get into cars, and they do this only with people of color and poor people.

There are probably a lot Of others that aren’t occurring to me after a glass of wine.
 
Posts: 19763 | Location: A cluttered house in Metro D.C. | Registered: 20 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Does This Avatar Make My Butt Look Big?

Minor Deity
Picture of Cindysphinx
posted Hide Post
There are even times when people are stopped for an expired drivers license or a warrant. How can an officer know someone’s license is expired before they pull them over?

Cause the person was pulled over for a tricky tack reason that even the cop didn’t want to use as the basis for a citation.

I am so glad people are paying attention. Kudos to all of you.
 
Posts: 19763 | Location: A cluttered house in Metro D.C. | Registered: 20 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Has Achieved Nirvana
Picture of QuirtEvans
posted Hide Post
You've ignored the point, so let me say it again. If an officer wants to stop someone, they will simply say "they were driving erratically." So, taking away their opportunity to stop someone for a turn signal violation may make you feel better, but it won't actually accomplish anything ... unless you do what I suggest, and audit their dash cams. (And not just for the stops, but for the instances in which they chose not to make a stop.)

If you want to stop racist traffic stops, you'll need to do something that actually works, not something that feeds your preconception but doesn't actually have any positive real-world effect.
 
Posts: 45738 | Registered: 20 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Does This Avatar Make My Butt Look Big?

Minor Deity
Picture of Cindysphinx
posted Hide Post
Hey, you're the expert!
 
Posts: 19763 | Location: A cluttered house in Metro D.C. | Registered: 20 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Has Achieved Nirvana
Picture of Steve Miller
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by QuirtEvans:

If you want to stop racist traffic stops, you'll need to do something that actually works, not something that feeds your preconception but doesn't actually have any positive real-world effect.


I think you need to do what Camden did and what Minneapolis says they are going to do. Disband the entire corrupt enterprise and start over.

Not perfect but it seems to work.


--------------------------------
Life is short. Play with your dog.

 
Posts: 34941 | Location: Hooterville, OH | Registered: 23 April 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4  
 

    well-temperedforum.groupee.net    The Well-Tempered Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  Off Key    A White Woman, Racism, and a Poodle