South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem on Friday told tribes to take down road checkpoints they had set up to keep out unnecessary visitors because of concerns over the coronavirus.
The Republican governor said she would take legal action if the tribes didn't remove the checkpoints in 48 hours. Two tribes — the Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe — set up the checkpoints last month in an attempt to lock down their reservations amid fears infections could decimate members. The move sets up a potential legal showdown between a governor who has avoided sweeping stay-at-home orders and tribes that assert their sovereign rights allow them to control who comes on reservations.
The tribes have taken stronger action than the state because they are concerned the virus could overwhelm fragile health care systems that serve many people with underlying health problems. They are still allowing essential businesses on to the reservations and said the checkpoints were set up to keep out tourists or other visitors who could be carrying coronavirus infections.
“I request that the tribes immediately cease interfering with or regulating traffic on US and State Highways and remove all travel checkpoints,” Noem said in a statement.
Her spokeswoman Maggie Seidel said the checkpoints are illegal and the tribes should have taken them down last month after the Bureau of Indian Affairs said that tribes can close or restrict traffic on roads, but only if they get the permission of the owner of the road. A statement from the governor's office said the tribes have not consulted or gotten an agreement from the state.
But the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe said that it had met with local, state and federal officials to discuss the checkpoints and will not take them down.
Tribal chairman Harold Frazier issued a statement addressing Noem, saying, “You continuing to interfere in our efforts to do what science and facts dictate seriously undermine our ability to protect everyone on the reservation.”
Chase Iron Eyes, a spokesman for Oglala Sioux president Julian Bear Runner, said he expected the tribe to defend its rights as a sovereign nation to keep out threats to their health.
“We’d be interested in talking face to face with Governor Noem and the attorney general and whoever else is involved," he said.
-------------------------------- We are all visitors to this time, this place. We are just passing through. Our purpose here is to observe, to learn, to grow, to love… and then we return home. - Australian Aboriginal proverb
Bazootiehead-in-training
Posts: 37924 | Location: Somewhere in the middle | Registered: 19 January 2010
This is a tangled issue. Blocking an interstate highway is a federal issue. The federal government has an interest, a strong one, in maintaining road communications. The fact that it might be possible to exit the road and circuitously wind up on tribal land doesn't really merit blocking an interstate. Ditto for state roads and the state government. People need to get between point A and point B.
Much more merit in restricting access directly to residential areas of a reservation when those roads aren't major arteries connecting the state together.
Just reading the stories, I can't tell how much of this is about health and how much of this is about ongoing political agendas of both sides.
Posts: 12537 | Location: Williamsburg, VA | Registered: 19 July 2005
